Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Rules? What Rules? (Week 15)

Throughout the semester, we have discussed the ways in which writing is always situated and how rhetoric allows us to understand the complex system in which any language act is immersed. Conventions, the 'rules' change depending on your purpose, audience, etc. So now, for your penultimate blog post, I would like to invite everyone to think about and post the advice that guides or informs your writing practice. It can be a reflection on the wisdom passed to you through a long-ago teacher, or something offbeat and idiosyncratic (for example, Hugo advises to write only in pen and never erase--just scratch out that which you no longer want furiously).

In class last Thursday, I provided a handout of 'rules' that I have taken to heart as a writer, things that inform my writing habits. You may access a digital version of that handout here. As you will note, this is an assignment I like to give students at the end of our semester.

So, tell us: what are your writing rules to live by? Again, all are invited to post, though you are certainly welcome to respond to another's post if you would prefer, and please try to do so by Thursday, May 7.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

What Say You, Gen Y?

I came across this piece this morning as I browsed the news over my morning coffee, and thought--especially considering the context of this course and the topics you've all chosen for your research projects--that you might find it interesting. What power do you wield in participating in the public forum, in advancing public arguments? Here's what Assistant Professor Jim Burkee has to say about you:

[ . . .] the political loyalties of that coveted demographic are not yet decided. While they seem to lean to the left, they're actually more libertarian than liberal, a fact that will reshape the way we think about liberalism and conservatism in decades to come.

[. . .]

In short, they love their freedom.

[. . .]

The truth is, [America's Generation Y (born between 1980 and 1995)], which seems not to fit in any neat political category, is more ideologically consistent than either Democrats or Republicans. The conservatism that dominates the Republican Party today is a combination of limited government in some places (taxation and regulation), but bigger and more intrusive government elsewhere (homeland security, military and on social issues). The Democratic Party is just as inconsistent, preferring government to be hands-off on social and civil liberty issues, but large elsewhere in areas like health care and other entitlements. [more]


So what say you, Gen Y?

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Schedule for Weeks 13 & 14

To ensure that you have adequate time to complete your projects for April 23, class will convene as follows:

Tuesday, April 14--Cohort Work Day
You may use class time to work together on your projects at a location of your choice. Progress reports are required by the end of the day via Learn@UW.

Thursday, April 16--Full Class

Class will meet as usual in 6110.

Tuesday, April 21--Cohort Work Day
You may use this day to work with your cohort to ready your project for Thursday's presentations. Progress reports are required by the end of the day via Learn@UW.
Thursday, April 23--Collaborative Research Project Presentations
Our usual meeting time, place TBA.


Please keep in mind that on the Tuesdays designated as Cohort Work Days you are responsible for honoring the 75-minute class meeting, so come prepared. I will be available via e-mail, phone, or facebook chat--or you may come by my office. I will provide a form for your progress reports before you are required to submit them.

Consider This: Week 13

So far this semester, we have looked at the problem of Engaging the Polis from two angles: as analysts (is this appeal effective? what makes it so?) and as a claimant or rhetorical agent, one who advances an argument. We have not taken the time to reflect on ourselves as members of the polis, members of the public audience . . . until now.

For this week's blog, please take some time to think about the following question:
What engages you?

As you prepare for your cohort's oral presentation, it is helpful to think about what it takes to engage an audience; your own experience as an audience can be a valuable resource. So what engages you? What techniques, approaches, etc. grasp your attention, hold your focus, get you interested, inspire you to think, to act, to question? Can you think of a specific, memorable time when you were fully 'engaged?' What lessons might you take from that experience as you approach your own oral presentation?

Having trouble? One alternative you might also wish to explore is what, for you, fails in public delivery? What is off-putting? What undermines engagement from your perspective as an audience member? What would be your personal list of don'ts?

Hopefully, this exercise will help you think about ways to approach your oral presentations . . . and offer others valuable advice, as well.

Bloggers, please post by Tuesday (April 14), midnight.
Respondents, you have until Saturday (April 18), midnight.

Collaborative Research Project Presentation Guidelines

Below you will find a version of the handout from today's class. ~CrS

An oral presentation, like everything we have done or studied in class this semester, is a rhetorical act; therefore, your presentation must evidence the same rhetorical awareness we have come to expect in any effective rhetorical act. Though less formal than a traditional oral presentation, the purpose of this assignment is multifaceted: to introduce your subject to an audience beyond your cohort; to gain experience articulating a complex project cogently and practice organizing in-process content; to introduce your subject to, and invite feedback from, an audience of your peers. The following guidelines, adapted for our purposes from Jan D'Arcy’s Technically Speaking: A Guide for Communicating Complex Information (1998), should help you as your prepare your presentation.

A. Organization and Development of Content
Opening statement gained immediate attention (estb. presence, ethos)
Purpose of presentation made clear (to inform, persuade, explore . . . )
Cohort made good use of the time allotted (no more than 10 minutes)
Main ideas stated clearly, logically, and with distinctive, appropriate style
Organizational pattern easy to follow/well organized
Main points explained or proved by supporting points
Variety of pistis (testimony, statistics, etc.) presented (depth, specificity, substance)
Conclusion adequately summed up main points, purpose

B. Delivery
Presenters “owned the space” and were in control
Held rapport with audience throughout speech
Eye contact to everyone in audience
Strong posture and meaningful gestures
Involved, in some meaningful way, all members of the cohort

C. Visuals
Visuals clear and visible to entire audience
Creative and emphasized main points
Presenter handled unobtrusively and focused on audience
Visuals did not compete with or usurp the presenters

D. Voice
Volume
Rate (pacing)
Pitch
Quality
Energetic and included everyone in dialogue

E. Comments
Invited discussion
Actively engaged the audience

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Week 11 Cohort Conferences

Below I have proposed times when I would like to meet with you, as a cohort, to discuss your research projects. This will be the first of a few, and it is really an opportunity for a very focused, small-group discussion specific to your project, but also to your individuals goals for the class. For this first cohort conference, I anticipate meeting for approximately 30 minutes. Please be sure to communicate with all members of your cohort before you sign up: it is important that everyone can attend. If none of the times available work (note that there are more appointment times than cohorts), we can try to negotiate one that meets everyone's schedule.

I will honor your requests 'first come, first served.' You may post your preferences as a comment here (preferred) or you may e-mail me.


Wednesday, April 1

12:00 Major Differences

2:15 Word of MouF

3:00 The New Standard of Normalcy

Thursday, April 2

12:00 Pancakes

3:15 Girl's Eye View

4QE: The Final Individual Essay

Thus far this semester, we have examined several forms and genres and have analyzed, from a rhetorical perspective, the way each presents a unique argument—or, perhaps more accurately, how different forms or genres offer unique opportunities, unique presentations, of specific claims and thus employ different types of appeals. This assignment, your final Quarterly Essay, offers you the opportunity to apply everything we’ve discussed about language, rhetoric, and public argument and craft an original argument of your own. In order to tailor the assignment to your own personal and professional interests and needs, please choose from one of the following options:

Option 1: Creative Nonfiction Essay
The work you have done thus far this semester has been analytical, formal, academic; this assignment offers you the opportunity to ‘play’ a little by exploring writing as a craft rather than as a mere vehicle for communication. The writing you will do for this option does not depart entirely from the practice you've had through the first two quarterly essays nor from the work you have been doing in your cohorts toward the research project; in fact, writing creative nonfiction relies on or draws from many of the principles that guide formal academic writing and research. The difference lies in the subject matter, approach, style, and delivery—in brief, the writer=s rhetorical situation and purpose.

This option, therefore, asks that you attempt (essayer) a creative nonfiction essay of you own and offers you the opportunity to merge the discipline of research and analysis with the aesthetic qualities of creative writing and to write about a subject from a perspective and in a style that is entirely your own. As Gutkind advises, “Ultimately, the primary goal of the creative nonfiction writer is to communicate information, just like a reporter, but to shape it in a way that reads like fiction.” In this regard, our work with rhetorical tropes and schemes, types of appeals, kairos, and forms of public argument should serve you well; in short, rely on your rhetorical awareness when crafting your essay.

Your creative nonfiction essay should be focused and economical, and it should also be well developed and immediate. The approximate length for this assignment should be 7 to 10 pages, but let your subject be your guide.


Option 2: The Academic Expository Essay
Exposition is, in many ways, an academic institution in and of itself. Encompassing a variety of forms, or rhetorical modes—including narrative and description, process-analysis, comparison/ contrast, illustration, and, of course, the traditional argumentative or persuasive paper—expository writing seeks to examine, highlight, inform, and/or reveal something about a topic, issue, or problem. Most of you have used the form consistently in your blogs, and it is the genre you employed in your first two Quarterly Essays.

For this option, then, you have the opportunity to choose a topic and issue that you find relevant, timely, and interesting, and advance a unique public argument that explores, provides commentary about, or informs your audience about the subject.

This essay should provide a thorough examination of a subject from a unique and informed perspective; it should evidence a clear rhetorical purpose (as we have discussed throughout the semester). The approximate length for this essay should be 7 to 10 pages, but (as always) honor content over page length requirement.

Option 3: The Statement of Purpose/Personal Statement
This option is specifically designed for those of you who plan to go on to graduate or professional school, apply for internships or study abroad programs, et al. As part of the application process, most programs will ask that you craft a statement that represents your character and goals and gestures toward your interest and/or investment in their program. The key is understanding that the Statement of Purpose is your opportunity to not only introduce yourself to an admissions committee, but also to argue that you are a valuable potential candidate for the program, one that must not be overlooked.

The conventions for Statements vary from organization to organization; if you intend to continue your education, it is well worth your time to investigate the expectations of your chosen profession or desired program with regard to the application process—even if this is just a practice run. If you do not yet have a specific path in mind, then you may elect to write a general statement that you can later revise and tailor to meet the specific expectations of your application. The thing to remember is that this form, perhaps more than any other, is explicitly about ethos—your ethos. What will make you stand out as a unique and promising candidate among a large population of qualified, experienced, and enthusiastic competitors? The Statement of Purpose affords you some measure of control. A well-crafted Statement should run about two-pages, but bear in mind that these two pages will likely be the most economical, labor-intensive two pages you may ever write, and that the length expectations and limits will vary from program to program. For the purposes of this assignment, if you have no specific application guidelines, two pages is a reasonable metric.